Former India spinner Harbhajan Singh feels Suryakumar Yadav should be in the starting XI come the World Cup because he can do in his role what even Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma can't. Harbhajan feels the selectors and group the executives were all in all correct to pick Suryakumar On the planet Cup crew in front of Sanju Samson, who was likewise in the running for a center request job for India. "I feel Suryakumar Yadav is a finished, complete player," Harbhajan said in a talk coordinated by Star Sports. "I don't think the selectors have been brutal on Sanju Samson. I really do feel Sanju is a great player, a quality player. In any case, you can choose fifteen players. Yet, picking Suryakumar over Sanju is the right call. "Since the game that Suryakumar has in the center over[s], I don't think Sanju has that game. Indeed, even he goes for big cheeses from the primary ball, yet the dependability Suryakumar gives you - he can score huge. Sanju I feel plays the sort of cricket where there is a great deal of chances that you get out. While Suryakumar, I realize a many individuals ask what has he done in ODIs, however what he has done in T20s, on the off chance that his innings is simply going to be that long, I feel there, there is definitely not a preferable player over Suryakumar in India. "What he can do at that position, neither Virat [Kohli] can do, nor Sanju or Rohit Sharma. Since what he takes care of it's a troublesome business, batting at [No.] 5-6. What [MS] Dhoni has done, what Yuvi [Yuvraj Singh] has done." Such a long ways in his vocation, Suryakumar hasn't figured out how to decipher his progress in T20 cricket into the 50-overs design - an issue he has himself recognized. He midpoints 24.33 in ODIs, with just two half-hundreds of years in 24 innings. Harbhajan, be that as it may, feels Suryakumar has the game to sparkle in the difficult center request job in ODIs. "Since batting there is the hardest," Harbhajan said. "Opening in [one-dayers], you know where to score runs. You have a ton of time. However, when you go in to bat after 20-25 overs, you really want the game to know where you can track down holes to get limits and I don't figure anybody in the Indian group can do that better than Suryakumar. What's more, assuming it really depended on me, I would play him in the group. Since when he is in the group, it presses the resistance. Regardless of whether he fires. Since till the time he is at the wrinkle, there will be pressure on the grounds that on any day he can play a game dominating innings. He can hit 50-60 runs in 20 balls. "So you need to play a player like this. You can't squander him by keeping him out. So that closes the discussion on regardless of whether Sanju ought to be in the group in front of Suryakumar. Regardless of whether Sanju is in the group, Suryakumar Yadav ought to be in the XI." Arshdeep Singh and Yuzvendra Chahal - India's two major misses? Harbhajan likewise feels India ought to have picked left-arm quick bowler Arshdeep Singh for the assortment he brings to the speed assault, as well as legspinner Yuzvendra Chahal, whom he named a "demonstrated match victor". "I think there are two individuals missing from the group. One is Yuzvendra Chahal and the second is Arshdeep Singh. Since I believe if a left-arm seamer can get the new ball [to the right-hander] toward the beginning, it has a gigantic effect in the game," Harbhajan said. "Since, in such a case that he can get two early wickets… dislike a right-hander can't do that however left-arm seamers get a characteristic point. "You would have seen players like Shaheen Shah Afridi or Mitchell Starc, they have a tremendous effect. At the point when Australia won the World Cup [in 2015], Mitchell Starc had a gigantic effect, excusing Brendan McCullum first [third] ball. So approaching ball at that speed coming in to one side hander is dependably a test. India have picked Ravindra Jadeja, Axar Patel and Kuldeep Yadav as their twist choices for the World Cup, with the initial two contribution a comparable approach as left-arm customary spinners. Harbhajan would have enjoyed more assortment in India's twist contingent. With no offspinner in India's crew, Harbhajan would have favored another wristspinner who can turn the ball in the two headings. "The second [notable miss in the squad] is Yuzvendra Chahal," he said. "Demonstrated match-victor. Somebody who has taken more number of wickets than some other spinner. Assuming he was playing for some other country, he would have figured he would make the playing XI like clockwork. In the wake of demonstrating so a lot, he ought to have been there in the group. "Since we have picked two remaining arm spinners and the two of them won't play a similar game together. Also, it very well might be so that when the resistance is loaded with left-handers, Jadeja may not bowl his overs as you would need somebody who can remove the ball from the left-hander. "I believe on the off chance that you need to play three spinners you ought to have a left-arm spinner, a legspinner and an offspinner. What's more, on the off chance that you are picking a legspinner, perhaps it's actually OK on the off chance that you don't pick an offspinner. Yet, you didn't pick a legspinner or an offspinner and picked two remaining arm spinners, that is a piece stunning."