At times things are acquired, as opposed to lost, in interpretation. Marizanne Kapp, for example, was not off-base when she told a public interview on Monday, "We rejected together an adequate number of rushes to move past the line." It was anything but a mistake. Prior she had utilized "rejected" in a similar sense in a TV interview. Kapp, whose first language is Afrikaans, ought to have said South Africa figured out. That would have been right, yet it could not have possibly been correct. Since they didn't figure their runs out in their World Cup match against England in Tauranga. They rejected for them, and rejected hard. Had England taken one of the four risks, including a befuddling, that they squandered attempting to excuse Laura Wolvaardt - the first of them nine balls into the match - she could not have possibly moored South Africa's innings until the 36th over and scored 77. Had Sune Luus not shared 73 with Wolvaardt, and had Kapp not followed her 5/45 - strikingly her initial five-for in the 116th time she has bowled in her 121 ODIs - by filling the gap left by Wolvaardt to score an abrasive 32, the outcome would almost certainly have been unique. Wolvaardt's consistently satiny strokeplay separated, and even she made due and succeeded from a fair not many misleading shots, South Africa's batting was rough. In the most ideal way; the Kapp way. The equivalent was valid in their matches against Bangladesh and Pakistan, in which they batted first and were excused for 207 and held to 233/9. Against England, they decided to handle first and were set an objective of 236 - and made their most elevated all out of the competition such a long ways to win by three wickets with four balls in excess. That obvious just the second time South Africa had beaten England in the seven World Cup matches the groups have challenged, and interestingly beginning around 2000. It was additionally only the second time in the 24 World Cup games in which England had set up a sum of at least 230 that they neglected to guard it. The success was South Africa's third in as many matches at the current year's competition. They have celebrated hattricks already, however in 1997 one of the components was Denmark and, in 2000, the Netherlands. This is whenever they first have taken down three of the game's more grounded groups continuously at one World Cup. They are the main other group at the competition other than Australia with an ideal record after three matches. Britain additionally enrolled a hattrick on Monday, albeit not one to celebrate. South Africa's prosperity over them followed their limited misfortunes to Australia and West Indies, making this whenever they first have gone down in three successive games at a World Cup. That comes directly following four losses in the white-ball designs in Australia in January and February. Seldom have England, who have won four of the 11 releases of the World Cup and are the defending champs, been in such unfortunate shape. Every one of the three of their games have been tight, yet the truth of the matter is they are second from base in the standings, sandwiched among Bangladesh and Pakistan. That is a rude awakening for those South Africa allies who need to accept their group are headed for greatness this time. Perhaps they are, however at the present time everything they've done is beat the most obviously awful performing three sides in the competition. Their greater difficulties are just on the horizon, beginning with New Zealand in Hamilton on Thursday. Kapp knew that: "We are not even close to our best yet, particularly with the bat, and I figure today will go quite far to give us a lift in the correct bearing." She's been around sufficiently long to know something different when she sees it: progress. "In the past the nearby games were the ones we lost," she said, and got back to her primary point. "We realize we have not played our best cricket, yet it's not the way in which you start the World Cup that is important. It's the manner by which you end it." That Kapp really considered going there lets us know all that we really want to be familiar with her. It was against England that South Africa's 2017 mission finished. In an unwatchably tense semi-last in Bristol, the home side won by two wickets with two balls remaining. Kapp made a barren figure sitting on the outfield long after the match finished and the field cleared. The memory has stayed crude: "We know the disaster we had in the past World Cup." And yet she didn't recoil at returning to that aggravation, and on second thought involved it as a proportion of how far South Africa have come. How would you not go gaga for that?